Chemical and biological warfare

It is use of harmful or deadly chemical or biological agents as weapons of war. These agents can kill many people and are considered weapons of mass destruction. Chemical weapons are made up of poisonous chemical compounds, whereas biological weapons are living microorganisms. Toxin weapons contain poisonous chemical products of living organisms and are sometimes classified separately. Chemical and biological weapons can cause injury in several ways. Most cause injury or death when inhaled, and some cause injury through contact with skin or through ingestion of contaminated food.

A chemical or biological attack
Usually involves dispersing agents into the air. This can be done in various ways, such as firing artillery shells that burst in mid-air, or using airplanes to spray the agents over an area. If released outdoors, these types of weapons can be affected by weather conditions. Rain would reduce the effectiveness of the agents, and wind might spread them in unexpected directions. Because chemical and biological agents are seen as random, dangerous, and particularly cruel weapons, they have rarely been used. In the 20th century, chemicals were used extensively as battlefield weapons only in World War I (1914-1918) and the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988). The release of the nerve agent sarin in a Tokyo subway in 1995 was a rare terrorist chemical attack.


The 1972 Biological Weapons Convention
And the 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention are the most recent international agreements prohibiting these types of weapons, and both have been signed by many countries. Nevertheless, analysts contend that following the Iran-Iraq War, more countries began to secretly develop chemical and biological weapons, and the threat of their use has become greater. Iraq in particular has been accused of stockpiling such weapons, and Iraqi resistance to United Nations weapons inspections in the late 1990s raised international awareness of the need for stronger efforts to control biological and chemical weapons.

Chemical weapons
Chemical warfare involves the use of chemical compounds to kill or seriously injure an enemy. Several countries began eliminating their chemical weapons stockpiles in the 1990s, but the threat of their use still exists. A Chemical warfare agents can be grouped into two general types: those that affect the body surfaces they contact, and those that damage the general nervous system. Surface agents include phosgene gas (COCl2), chlorine gas, hydrogen cyanide, and mustard gas. The principal action of phosgene, chlorine, and hydrogen cyanide occurs through inhalation. Phosgene is a choking agent that causes the lungs to fill with water, while chlorine destroys the cells that line the respiratory tract. Hydrogen cyanide blocks oxygen from reaching the blood. Mustard gas is actually composed of tiny droplets of liquid that are dispersed in the air, where they are inhaled like a gas. Mustard is a blistering agent that damages any surface it contacts, including the skin, eyes, and lungs. It may cause death by respiratory failure. In this group is also tear gas. It is a chemical substance that produces a primary physical effect of stinging or tearing eyes. Tear gas also irritates other mucous membranes and causes choking and coughing. People exposed to higher concentrations may experience burning, itching, or even blistering skin.


Nerve agents act by blocking the transmission of nerve messages throughout the body. These agents include sarin, soman, tabun, VX and nerve gas. All act by disrupting the normal action of a neurotransmitter called acetylcholine. Whether inhaled or absorbed through the skin, a single drop of nerve agent can shut down the body’s nervous system. The most powerful of this group is VX, but all can cause death within minutes after exposure. Nerve gas works by blocking the body’s production of an enzyme called cholinesterase. This allows the neurotransmitter acetylcholine to build up in the body. When this happens, muscles contract but cannot relax. Victims suffer from headaches, runny nose, narrowing of the pupils, and a tightened chest.


Herbicides, such as Agent Orange, are chemicals that kill vegetation. Agent Orange was used during the Vietnam War (1959-1975) as a defoliant, destroying jungle leaves to expose enemy troops. Some people regard herbicides as chemical weapons if used for hostile purposes, but there is no universal agreement about this, since herbicides are not directly intended to harm humans or animals. However, veterans of the Vietnam War suffered several health problems blamed on exposure to Agent Orange and other toxins.

History of chemical weapons
Large-scale use of chemical weapons first occurred in 1915 during World War I, when German troops released chlorine gas from cylinders as the wind blew toward French lines a few hundred yards away. The yellow-green cloud enveloped the French soldiers, who choked and panicked. As the war continued, phosgene and other chemical weapons were used, culminating with Germany’s introduction of mustard gas in 1917. By the end of the war in 1918, all the major powers had used chemical weapons.
The suffering caused by the gas attacks led to the 1925 Geneva Protocol, which banned the use of chemical or bacteriological agents in war. Although most major countries became parties to the agreement, the United States declined to until 1975. Nevertheless, the Protocol encouraged an international norm that helped deter the use of these weapons.


Biological warfare
Biological weapons are a unique class of weapons, a living organism. These biological agents represent a dangerous military threat because they are alive, and are therefore unpredictable and uncontrollable once released. This is one important reason that biological weapons have rarely been used.

Biological warfare agents include bacteria, viruses, fungi, and other living microorganisms that can kill or make person unable to move. Since they can reproduce, biological agents have the unique potential to make an environment more dangerous over time. If used for hostile purposes, any disease-causing microorganism could be considered a weapon. For the purposes of warfare, specific characteristics of certain agents make them more likely to be used than others.


Some potential warfare agents can make their victims very sick without necessarily killing them. Examples include the microorganisms that cause tularemia, Q fever, and yellow fever. After suffering debilitating illness, victims of these diseases often recover, although not always. Other agents are more likely to be lethal. The bacteria that cause bubonic plague and the virus that causes smallpox can kill large numbers of untreated people. Early antibiotic treatment usually cures plague victims, and smallpox vaccinations before exposure to the virus can prevent the disease.


Anthrax bacteria are considered likely weapons because of their particular features. They can exist as hardy, shell-like forms called spores. In a warm, moist environment like the human lung, the spores can become active and highly lethal. Anthrax bacteria are usually found under the soil surface, and cause disease primarily in cattle and other grazing livestock. But if released into the air and inhaled, a few thousand spores can be fatal.


Botulinum toxin is also lethal in tiny doses. Although often categorized as a biological weapon, the toxin is not itself a living agent, but a product of the bacterium Clostridium botulinum. The toxin is dangerous whether inhaled or ingested in food or drink. A gallon of botulinum toxin could poison a small city’s water system, but existing water purification systems can neutralize the toxin and protect city dwellers.

Biological Warfare History
The use of biological weapons has been more rare than the use of chemical weapons. In the 14th century, plague-infected dead bodies were catapulted into an enemy camp in the Russian Crimea. In colonial America, the British delivered blankets from their smallpox to Native Americans, hoping to infect them with the disease. In the 20th century, the only extensive military biological attacks were by Japan against China in the late 1930s and 1940s. The Japanese dropped plague and other bacteria from airplanes over several towns, causing outbreaks of disease. The only large-scale terrorist attack with a biological weapon occurred in 1984 in the United States. Members of the Rajneesh cult in Oregon placed salmonella bacteria in the salad bars of several restaurants. Although 750 people became ill, none died.

DELIVERY SYSTEMS
Chemical and biological agents are most effective when dispersed into the air. These agents are often fitted into bombs or artillery shells that are designed to explode in the air and spread their contents over an enemy. In the 1980s, the United States began to deploy binary chemical weapons. Older chemical shells and bombs housed a single blistering or nerve agent. As they aged, these weapons could leak their poisons. A binary weapon is safer because it contains two relatively harmless chemicals. Only after firing do the chemicals combine to form a potent mix.

In som warfare or terrorist action, an explosive release is not necessary. Members of Aum Shinrikyo attacked the Tokyo subway by packing sarin in plastic containers. To release the nerve agent, they pierced the containers with sharp umbrella tips. The leaking liquid and vapor affected thousands of passengers.


Microorganisms are generally more fragile than chemicals, and some might not survive an explosion. But several, like anthrax spores, do remain potent after an explosive release. In any case, United States Army tests have shown that biological agents can be broadly dispersed in a variety of non-explosive ways. In the 1950s and 1960s the Army released bacteria and chemical particles in hundreds of tests in populated areas throughout the country. Agents were sprayed at San Francisco from a boat offshore, dispensed from slow-moving cars in Minneapolis and St. Louis, and released from light bulbs dropped in the New York subway. The bacteria and chemicals in the tests were not as dangerous as actual warfare agents, although they posed some risks to the exposed populations. They demonstrated that an enemy or terrorist could expose millions of people to disease-causing organisms by a variety of simple techniques.

PROTECTION FROM CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ATTACK

Total protection from chemical or biological attack is difficult, but steps can be taken to reduce the effects. Four approaches to protection commonly prescribed include early detection of chemical or biological agents, physical shelter from the agents, decontamination of exposed materials and clothing, and appropriate medical treatments.

Detection and Shelter
Since many chemical and biological agents are colorless, odorless, and tasteless, an attack could take place without the victims realizing it. But if chemical detection devices were situated in an area of attack, they could signal that a dangerous chemical was present. The military can use chemical detection equipment in combat areas and is developing detection kits for soldiers. Detection kits might contain treated paper or liquids that change color when certain chemical agents are present.


Confirming the presence of a biological agent is more difficult. Even if a biological attack were known to be occurring, quick identification of the offending organism might be difficult. The U.S. military has developed a field apparatus that can test an air sample for the presence of specific biological agents. Called a Biological Integrated Detection System (BIDS), it can confirm the presence of a handful of microorganisms, including anthrax and plague bacteria. However, there are scores of possible biological agents that cannot be easily detected.


Several efforts are being made to develop a generic detector of dangerous organisms, using techniques like laser technology and mass spectrometry. Despite such efforts, the ability to rapidly identify all possible warfare agents in the field remains elusive.


Once chemical or biological agents are detected, a sealed, ventilated shelter can provide protection. Gas masks prevent agents from entering the lungs, and protective outer garments keep toxic agents from touching bare skin. From a military standpoint, each of these methods has disadvantage. Remaining in an enclosure constrains a soldier’s ability to fight, while cumbersome outerwear restricts mobility, and a mask imposes limits on vision.


Decontamination and Treatment
Quick decontamination of exposed surfaces is possible for most chemical and biological agents. Special powders, or just soap and water can neutralize some chemical and most biological agents. A few agents, like anthrax spores, may not be easily decontaminated if located in deep cracks or other inaccessible places.


Medical or drug treatment can help some victims of chemical and biological weapons. Bleaching powder can lessen skin injuries from mustard exposure, if applied soon after contact. Atropine and other antidotes can neutralize the effects of nerve agents. Since nerve agents can kill in minutes, the antidotes must be injected almost immediately after exposure. A pretreatment drug called pyridostigmine bromide may help prevent the effects of certain nerve agents, although studies suggest the drug may have unwanted side effects.


Vaccinations can protect against some biological agents, such as anthrax, and some are susceptible to antibiotics. For many agents, there is no protection. In diseases that can be treated by antibiotics, therapy must begin promptly. To be effective against plague bacteria, antibiotics must be given within 24 hours after exposure. Against anthrax, antibiotic therapy must start within 12 hours or it will probably be useless.


INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS
Several international treaties and conventions have tried to regulate the conduct of warfare, with varying results. The Hague Conferences in 1899 and 1907 started the modern age of international arms control. More recent arms control agreements seek to regulate, and in some cases eliminate, certain classes of weapons.


Protocols and Conventions
Three international agreements deal explicitly with chemical and biological weapons. The first, the 1925 Geneva Protocol, prohibits the use in war of poison gas and bacteriological weapons. The second, the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention, bans not only the use, but the development, production, and stockpiling of biological and toxin weapons. The 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention does the same for chemical weapons. Unlike the earlier treaties, however, the chemical pact provides for methods to verify that countries are complying with the agreement and penalties for countries that do not comply.

The Biological Weapons Convention
Was the first international agreement to ban an entire category of weapons. It was established three years after a decision in 1969 by the United States to eliminate its own biological arsenal. Most major powers, including the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) and the United States, had become parties to the biological treaty when it went into force in 1975. Later, more countries joined in the agreement and the world appeared about to be rid of germ weapons. However, in the early 1980s United States officials alleged that the Soviets continued an illegal biological weapons program. At the same time, Iraq was launching chemical attacks against Iran. The taboo on the use of these weapons seemed to be weakening despite the intentions of the Geneva Protocol and the Biological Weapons Convention.


Weapons Disposal and Inspection
Parties to the chemical convention have agreed to destroy their chemical weapons within the next decade. This is an expensive and complicated process for countries with large arsenals. Estimated costs to destroy the U.S. stockpiles are about $10 billion; experts estimate that Russia will have to spend more than $5 billion to eliminate the stockpiles of old Soviet weapons. The methods of destruction include chemical neutralization (adding other chemicals to form a nonlethal substance) and incineration. Projected expenses also reflect the need for safety and environmental protection during the process.


Biological agents can usually be more easily destroyed than chemical agents. Ultraviolet light or disinfectants like formaldehyde are effective against most microorganisms. But some, like anthrax bacteria, are harder to kill and can persist in an environment indefinitely.


Partly inspired by the verification provisions in the Chemical Weapons Convention, parties to the biological treaty are now working to strengthen the ban against germ weapons. As experts recognize, however, detecting illegal biological activities can be more difficult than chemical detection. The technology needed to build a large biological arsenal is simpler and requires less space than for a chemical arsenal, so biological weapons can be more easily hidden.



Seminárne práce
Cudzie jazyky
História
Informatika
Prírodné vedy
Slovenský jazyk
Spoločenské vedy

Slovenský jazyk
Autori
Čitateľský denník
Gramatika
Literatúra
Slohy

Cudzie jazyky
Angličtina
Nemčina
Španielčina

História
Osobnosti
Slovenské dejiny
Svetové dejiny

Prírodné vedy
Biológia
Chémia
Fyzika
Geografia
Matematika
Medicína

Spoločenské vedy
Ekonómia
Filozofia
Náboženstvo
Pedagogika
Politológia, Sociológia
Právo
Psychológia
Sociálna práca

Ostatné
Gastronómia
Informatika
Osobnosti
Šport
Umenoveda

Ťaháky
Cudzie jazyky
História
Informatika
Prírodné vedy
Slovenský jazyk
Spoločenské vedy
Pridať referát